This web forum is displayed for archive purposes and is no longer accepting public contributions. For queries relating to the content of this web forum, please contact the Petitions Committee.
Sarah
14 June 2016 at 15:28I would suggest that any such requirement is both sexist and ageist. There is no way I could wear high heels for any length of time now. A smart court shoe is available at low, medium and high heel heights which means employers could be more flexible in their dress code requirements whilst allowing women workers a choice.
Varvara
14 June 2016 at 13:56I am very thankful that when I was working the dress code was fair, flexible and practical for both sexes. During my working life I had to have an operation on my foot, which resulted in my having to wear flat shoes for the rest of my life. The highest heels I possessed were only 1/2 inch and they had to be given away after the op. I now possess several pairs of smart and dainty flats that complement any smart outfit and would be very suitable for work. I would have been devastated if I had to choose between my job and my health. I watched a documentary about a an airline where female cabin crew were told what make-up to wear. Interestingly, this requirement did not appear to extend to female pilots. I remember thinking that I don't care what shade of lipstick they wear (if any) so long as they give good service. I would have had no problem with wearing a tie to work as I did so from the age of 5 to 18. Until men are required to wear 3 inch heels and make-up as part of the dress code, then women should not be required to do so. Women should not be forced to make a choice between their health and their employment. Surely that any company that does so is blackmailing their employees?
Kathryn Brannigan
14 June 2016 at 13:37When I worked as a sales assistant at a retailer in Liverpool I was made to wear high heels to work. It was a stipulation of the then area manager at the time. This was despite long days on our feet on the shop floor often standing in one place for hours on end to welcome customers or provide security. This post has been edited by the moderator to remove the name of a specific company/employer.
Helen
14 June 2016 at 12:35As an NHS employee, I was not required to wear high heels at work, and never did so. Had it been asked of me, I would have found it totally unacceptable, as I never wear high heels. Flat shoes are more comfortable and kinder to feet. Today there is a huge choice of stylish and smart flat shoes, so high heels should be a personal choice, not a requirement, in the workplace.
London Temp
14 June 2016 at 12:07I have been temping as a PA for the past year, mostly in the Private Equity sector, and although I have never been explicitly asked to wear heels I know my agency are instructed to tell us to wear them. I have also heard stories about other temps being told they must have clear or light pink nail polish on at all times. I have also been told that I should wear a dress or skirt to an interview. Personally I don't think any of these requirements are reasonable. I am perfectly capable of wearing flat shoes and trousers and still looking very smart, and able to do just as good a job. A reasonable work dress code will differ according to the company culture, some places are much more casual than others. If a company feels the need to enforce a dress code it should apply to all genders, without specific references to women. Much of these rules are incredibly outdated and serve absolutely no purpose other than to make women feel uncomfortable. I am appalled that companies are still able to enforce them without breaking the law.
Lucy
14 June 2016 at 12:02I am required to wear heels at work by my agency as a part-time freelance hostess and promotional team member. I did not challenge the requirement as I needed the work. I understand that the agency strives to retain an image of formality and glamour, but I think that the requirement for 3-inch heels is unreasonable considering the work (which requires standing still and/or walking for long periods of time, often without breaks, in a fast-paced environment). From personal experience, I know that I can perform better at work wearing lower heels (for example 1-1.5 inches) without sacrificing the formal image. For me, a reasonable work dress code means anything required by the employer (for example a uniform, or simply a requirement to dress in a formal style) as long as it does not result in both short-term pain and difficulty and long-lasting health implications for the employee.
Jane Browne
14 June 2016 at 10:10When I first started teaching in the 1970s we had a fight to allow women to wear trousers to work. I argued then that skirts and heels were impractical and uncomfortable and we won our case. It seems extraordinary that 40 years later women are still being forced to wear shoes that are restricting their movement and damaging their feet and posture.
Jordan Cook
14 June 2016 at 09:20During my previous employment as an admin assistant when I was 17, I was not allowed to wear flat shoes and was called into the manager's office for unacceptable personal appearance when I did wear flat shoes. I was also chastised for wearing trousers and was told that I should preferably wear skirts. This was despite the other two male members of staff regularly wearing trainers and jeans. Wearing high heels for eight hours a day caused me extreme pain and the pain would often continue during my days off causing me to cancel plans. This ostracisation also made me feel that I was employed as something to look at rather than my ability to do job efficiently.
Fatimah Ishaque
14 June 2016 at 05:12I previously worked in a coffee shop doing 8 hour long shifts sometimes longer and had to wear heels. Can you imagine having to stand all day in a pair of heels? They crush your toes, damage the skin in the back of your heels. They are very uncomfortable
Charlotte
14 June 2016 at 17:21What were the circumstances that led to you being made to wear high heels? For example: what type of work was involved? Were you a permanent or a temporary member of staff? - I was working at a fashion company. At the interview I was told that they prefer girls in heels but it was not a requirement. When I got there, I realised this was a lie. We had to wear heels all day for 8 hours on the shop floor. Going up and down the stairs to the stock room, dealing with customers and standing around. One hour for lunch and a one hour 'heel break' I remember crying in pain for several weeks while my feet got used to wearing heels all the time. I was permeant staff with 8 hours. Did you challenge the requirement? If so, what was the outcome? There was one time when my feet hurt so much, I was not able to carrying on wearing the heels so I had to take them off. I was then told that I had to put them on or otherwise I would be reported to my manager. Did you think that the requirement was reasonable? Not at all. We should have had the option to wear heels or not. What does a reasonable work dress code mean to you? The hight of the heel should not be a reason if you get a bad word from your manager or sent home. You can wear flat shoes and still look smart. The choice should be yours and not anybody else's. (This post has been edited by the moderator to remove the name of a specific company/employer.)