Early day motion 2621

Main content

Follow this EDM by:


That this House notes that the Association of Business Recovery Professionals-R3 (Rescue, Recovery, Renewal) has declared that present uncertainty surrounding `administration expenses' is forcing more businesses into closure instead of rescue; is concerned that trading a business in administration is being made far more expensive by suppliers, including `on suppliers' who take advantage of insolvency situations by demanding ransom payments, increasing tariffs on withdrawing supply altogether; supports R3's `Holding Rescue to Ransom' campaign which seeks amendment of section 233 of the Insolvency Act 1986, which fails to protect businesses in administration against such unreasonable actions; further notes R3's estimate that such a change could result in over 2,000 additional business rescues a year, a 14 per cent. reduction in liquidations, a 22 per cent. fall in the number of pre-packaged administrations, increased returns to creditors and more jobs being saved; andcalls on the Government to bring forward legislative proposals to ensure that suppliers continue to supply at a reasonable cost on insolvency, as is the case in the US under the `Chapter 11' procedure, and in doing so still have the security of priority payment as an `administration expense'.

Filter EDMs by:

Total number of signatures: 6

  1. Show:



    Supported by:
    A list of all MPs that have signed and support the motion.
    A list of MPs that have withdrawn their signature from the motion.

Showing 6 out of 6

Name Party Constituency Date Signed
Banks, Gordon Labour Party Ochil and South Perthshire 30.01.2012
Bottomley, Peter Conservative Party Worthing West 20.01.2012
Clarke, Tom Labour Party Coatbridge Chryston and Bellshill 23.02.2012
Durkan, Mark Social Democratic and Labour Party Foyle 19.01.2012
Ritchie, Margaret Social Democratic and Labour Party South Down 25.01.2012
Walker, Robin Conservative Party Worcester 30.01.2012