Read transcripts of debates in both Houses
Produced by Commons Library, Lords Library and Parliamentary Office Science and Technology
Search for Members by name, postcode, constituency and party
Learn about their experience, knowledge and interests
Celebrating people who have made Parliament a positive, inclusive working environment
Four staff networks for people to discuss and consider issues.
2018 marks 100 years since some women, and all men, could vote. Find out how you can join in
Sign up for the Your Parliament newsletter to find out how you can get involved
Take a tour of Parliament and enjoy a delicious afternoon tea by the River Thames
See some of the sights you’ll encounter on a tour of Parliament
Book a school visit, classroom workshop or teacher-training session
Access videos, worksheets, lesson plans and games
Follow this EDM by:
That this House, following the recent conclusion of McDonald's Corporation and McDonald's Restaurants Ltd vs Steel and Morris, the longest case in English legal history, notes with alarm the denial of legal aid and a jury trial for the unrepresented defendants, that the burden of proof rested on the defence who were presumed guilty until proven innocent, and Mr Justice Bell's finding that the defendants' counterclaim fell because, although McDonald's had issued defamatory, inaccurate and 'malicious' literature on the eve of trial to 'discredit' and to 'vent spite' on the defendants; further notes that United Kingdom anti-McDonald's campaigners have refused to recognise the verdict, distributing 400,000 leaflets on the Saturday after, and that the case has focused worldwide attention and condemnation of United Kingdom libel law; believes that interminable, complex, expensive, elitest, unfair and oppressive libel laws and procedures stacked in favour of rich and powerful plaintiffs have brought the courts into disrepute and are in need of urgent reform to safeguard public rights; and calls for multinationals to be treated in the same way as Government bodies which no longer have a right to sue for libel.
Total number of signatures: 13
Showing 13 out of 13
leave out from 'history' to end and add 'notes with relief that huge sums of legal aid are not available to assist destitute defamers to tell lies about others with minimal risk to themselves but at enormous cost to the public purse.'.
Total number of signatures: 3
Showing 3 out of 3