Skip to main content
Menu

Line by line check of Animal Welfare (Sentience) Bill concludes in the Lords

21 July 2021

There is no description available for this image (ID: 156707)

Members of the Lords concluded its line-by-line consideration of the Animal Welfare (Sentience) Bill during committee stage on Tuesday 20 July.

The Animal Welfare (Sentience) Bill sets up a new Animal Sentience Committee to report on the effect of government policy decisions on the welfare of animals as sentient beings.

Line by line examination

Committee stage is the first chance to check the bill in detail and make changes.

Proposed changes

Members put forward changes (PDF) (amendments) to consider at committee stage.

Members speaking discussed changes on a wide rage of subjects, including ruling out past policies from the Animal Sentience Committee's work, medical science, and invertebrates, cephalopods and decapods. 

Get involved

Watch and read the debate

Find out about all the issues members discussed: catch up on Parliament TV or read a transcript in Lords Hansard.

Explore further information

Read background on the bill in the House of Lords Library Animal Welfare (Sentience) Bill briefing.

Next steps

Report stage, an opportunity to closely scrutinise elements of the bill and make changes, is yet to be scheduled. 

Whats happened so far

Committee stage day one: Tuesday 6 July

Proposed changes

Members speaking on day one of committee stage discussed changes put forward.

Animal Sentience Committee

Members discussed changes to clarify the committee’s remit and defining the policy boundaries of its work. Some argued there is duplication with the existing Animal Welfare Committee and parliamentary oversight is required.

Forward looking

Members pressed for the committee’s work to be focussed on policy that comes into effect once it is established.

Medical research

Members highlighted important medical research involving animal research, including for the development of the COVID-19 vaccine, and argued it should be outside the committee’s remit.

Drafting of the bill

Members discussed ways to prevent unintended consequences of the bill’s drafting, saying the government is laying itself open to multiple judicial reviews.

Committee composition 

The new committee's membership also came in for scrutiny. Concern was raised about salary costs and the number of its members. Other members discussed who will sit on the committee and their professional expertise.

The government minister said he would be studying what was discussed to reflect on trying to make the bill more workable.

Catch up on Parliament TV or read a transcript in Lords Hansard.

Second reading: Wednesday 16 June

Members discussed the main issues in the bill during second reading.

Drafting of the bill

Some members questioned why animal sentience is not defined in the bill, saying legislation must be clearly defined.

Other members said the bill is poorly drafted, leaving the outcomes of it open to Judicial Review and other unintended consequences, and expressed confusion about its purpose.

Animal Sentience Committee

Members said the Animal Sentience Committee (ASC) created by the bill needs to be toughened if it is to fulfil the potential for increased recognition and application of animal sentience principles across government as a whole.

They also pushed to know more about who the members of the ASC will be and said important detail about its role and powers is currently lacking in the bill.

Invertebrates

Members argued there is sufficient evidence to indicate that non-vertebrates should be included in the bill and raised serious concern about the treatment of lobsters, crabs, and squid, in the way they have been stored and killed. 

Religious slaughter 

Areas in the bill were previously covered by EU law that exempted religious rites, cultural traditions and regional heritage. Members raised the issue of whether the ASC will consider religious slaughter.

The government minister said it would, but that it is for ministers to take into account the wider cultural, religious and health factors and to make decisions. 

Find out about all the issues discussed: Catch up on Parliament TV. Read the transcript of the debate in Lords Handard. 

Image: Bithin Raj / Unsplash