Domestic Abuse Bill returns to the Lords
27 April 2021
The Domestic Abuse Bill returns to the Lords on Tuesday 27 April for consideration of Commons amendments.
- Watch live on Parliament TV from 1pm
- Read the transcript in Lords Hansard from three hours after the debate
- List of suggested changes (PDF)
- Bills and legislation: Domestic Abuse Bill
- Explore the Lords Library briefing
- What is consideration of Commons amendments/ping pong?
Members are expected to discuss the use of contact centres in England, processing of victim and witness data for immigration purposes, and strategy for prosecution and management of offenders.
Members may also discuss the progress of the bill through the House at its conclusion of Lords stages.
Consideration of Commons amendments: Wednesday 21 April
Members discussed subjects including specialist training for magistrates and judges, and asked the government to think again on: child contact centres, data of migrant victims, recourse to funds and management of offenders.
There were four divisions (votes) on proposed amendments (changes) to the bill.
Child contact centres
The first vote was on Motion B1, which ensures all child contact centres and organisations regularly check their employees, agency workers and volunteers for compliance with national safeguarding standards in relation to domestic abuse.
Members voted 298 in favour and 240 against, so the change was made.
Personal data of migrant victims
The second vote was on Motion E1, which requires the government to ensure that personal data of a victim of (or witness to) domestic abuse is processed solely for the purposes of domestic abuse-related support, and should be not used for any immigration control purposes.
Members voted 307 in favour and 253 against, so the change was made.
Recourse to public funds
The third vote was on Motion F1, which requires the government to arrange, for the duration of the pilot Support for Migrant Victims Scheme, that victims of domestic abuse, and those who provide evidence, shall not be subject to restrictions on recourse to public funds due to their immigration status.
Members voted 292 in favour and 233 against, so the change was made.
Monitoring and identification of perpetrators
The final vote was on Motion G1, which inserts a new clause into the bill regarding the identification, monitoring and management of serial domestic abuse and stalking perpetrators.
The clause also amends the Criminal Justice Act 2003 to include a specified definition of a 'relevant domestic abuse or stalking perpetrator'.
Members voted 291 and 228 against, so the change was made.
The bill now returns to the House of Commons for further consideration of Lords amendments.
Third reading: Wednesday 24 March
Members discussed one drafting amendment to include the full name of the new law in a clause regarding the monitoring of pepretrators. This amendment was agreed to without a vote.
Members also discussed the progress of the bill through the House at its conclusion of Lords stages.
Lords report stage day four: Wednesday 17 March
Members discussed subjects including the Ending Violence Against Women and Girls Strategy and the investigation of links between online pornography and domestic abuse. Members also asked the government to think again on victim protection under the Istanbul Convention. Members also reached a compromise with the government regarding the recording of crimes motivated by sex or gender.
- Catch up on Parliament TV
- Read the Lords Hansard transcript
- Lords divisions (votes) results
- What is report stage?
There were two divisions (votes) on proposed amendments (changes) to the bill.
The first vote was on amendment 87, which ensures all victims of domestic abuse are protected, regardless of their status, in line with the Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence, known as the Istanbul Convention.
Members voted 310 in favour and 232 against, so the change was made.
The second vote was on amendment 87A, which demands an investigation into any link between online pornography and domestic abuse, with a view to bring into effect the age verification regime in the Digital Economy Act 2017 as a means of preventing domestic abuse.
Members voted 125 in favour and 242 against, so the change was not made.
Report stage day three: Monday 15 March
- Catch up on Parliament TV
- Read the Lords Hansard transcripts part one and part two
- Lords divisons (votes) results
There were three divisions (votes) on proposed amendments (changes) to the bill.
Data sharing for immigration
The first vote was on amendment 67. It requires the government to ensure that personal data of migrant domestic abuse surviors, which is given for seeking or receiving support and assistance, is not used for immigration control purposes.
Members voted 321 in favour and 262 against, so the change was made.
Leave to remain for migrant victims
The second vote was on amendment 70. It seeks to provide migrant victims of abuse with temporary leave to remain and access to public funds, for a period of no less than six months, so they can access support services while they flee abuse and apply to resolve their immigration status.
Members voted 318 in favour and 269 against, so the change was made.
Registration of serial perpetrators
The final vote was amendment 73. It makes arrangements for serial domestic abuse or stalking perpetrators to be registered on the Violent Offender and Sex Offender Register, and be subjected to supervision, monitoring and management through Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements.
The amendment also requires the government to provide a comprehensive perpetrator strategy for domestic abusers and stalkers within one year of the new law being passed.
Members voted 327 in favour and 232 against, so the change was made.
Report stage day two: Wednesday 10 March
Members voted for four changes to the bill relating to children, survivors and training for judges.
Child contact centres
This first vote was on amendment 41, which ensures all child contact centres are accredited in accordance with national standards on safeguarding and preventing domestic abuse.
Members voted 311 in favour and 237 against, so the change was made.
Training for judges
The second vote was on amendment 44, which requires the Secretary of State to publish a strategy for providing specialist training for judges and magistrates on matters relating to domestic abuse..
Members voted 286 in favour and 252 against, so the change was made.
The third vote was on amendment 50, which clarifies the degree of force which is reasonable under self-defence law where the defendant is a survivor of domestic abuse alleged to have used force against their abuser.
Members voted 298 in favour and 241 against, so the change was made.
Survivors who commit an offence
The final vote was on amendment 52, which provides provides a defence where a person is compelled to commit a crime because they live in a situation of domestic abuse.
Members voted 283 in favour and 245 against, so the change was made.
Report stage day one: Monday 8 March
Members discussed a range of topics, including dissolution of Jewish marriages, deliberate damage to the relationship between a child and a parent by the other parent and abuse during pregnancy.
There was one division (vote) on a proposed amendment (change) to the bill.
The vote was on amendment 4, which would bring the relationship between a disabled person and their carer within the definition of 'personally connected'.
Members voted 318 in favour and 234 against, so the change was made.
Committee stage day six: Wednesday 6 February
Members discussed subjects including the monitoring of serial and stalking perpetrators, the impact of online pornography on domestic abuse and ensuring guidance meets the needs of male victims and those in same sex relationships.
Committee stage day five: Monday 8 February
Members discussed a range of topics, including recourse to public funds for migrant and BAME victims, polygraph testing for offenders released on licence and controlling or coercive behaviour by counsellors or psychotherapists.
Committee stage day four: Wednesday 3 February
Members considered a range of topics, including preventing a perpetrator from engaging with a victim during family court proceedings, contact with a child for a parent awaiting trial or on bail for domestic abuse offences and confidentiality of refuge addresses
Committee stage day three: Monday 1 February
Members discussed a range of topics, including:
- disclosure of any immigration information
- support provided by local authorities to victims of domestic abuse
- accreditation of child contact centres and organisations that offer facilities or services for child contact.
Committee stage day two: Wednesday 27 January
Members considered a range of amendments relating to the role of the Domestic Abuse Commissioner, including:
- ensuring the Commissioner encourages best use of technology and data in identifying victims of domestic abuse
- ensuring members of the Commissioner's advisory board includes members with relevant experience with mental health, substance abuse, child welfare, male victims and same-sex relationships
- police notifications to the Commissioner about investigation of deaths where domestic abuse may be a contributing factor.
Committee stage day one: Monday 25 January
Members discussed a range of topics including:
- treatment of parental alienation that harms a child's welfare as a form of domestic abuse
- defining unreasonable prevention of dissolution of a religious Jewish marriage as abusive behaviour
- inclusion of unborn children as victims of domestic abuse.
Second reading: Tuesday 5 January
Baroness Williams of Trafford (Conservative), Home Office Minister, opened the debate and responded on behalf of the government.
Speakers included a former member of the Pre-legislation Consultative Committee on the Domestic Abuse Bill, a former Home Secretary, a former Women and Equalities Minister, and a former Deputy Assistant Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police.
Domestic Abuse Bill summary
This bill aims to:
- create and set out the functions for a Domestic Abuse Commissioner
- create a new civil preventative order regime - the Domestic Abuse Protection Notice (“DAPN”) and Domestic Abuse Protection Order (“DAPO”)
- require local authorities in England to support domestic abuse victims and their children in safe accomodation, and give priority to homeless victims
- prohibit perpetrators of certain offences from cross-examining their victims in court (and vice versa) and give courts the power to appoint a legal representative to conduct the cross-examination on their behalf
- clarify terms of consent for infliction of harm for sexual gratification and extend jurisdiction in criminal courts to further violent and sexual offences
- enable offenders to be subject to polygraph testing as a condition of their licence following release from custody
- places the guidance supporting the Domestic Violence Disclosure
Scheme on a statutory footing.
- Communities and families
- Crime, civil law, justice and rights
Employment and training
- Parliament, government and politics