Experts discuss the UK's Justice and Home Affairs opt-in
17 July 2018
The EU Home Affairs Sub-Committee takes evidence from academics and practitioners on how the UK's Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) opt-in will work in practice during the Brexit transition phase.
Wednesday 18 July 2018, Committee Room 4A, Palace of Westminster
- Professor Estella Baker, Professor of European Criminal Law and Justice, De Montfort University
- John Binns, Partner, BCL Solicitors LLP
- Professor Michael Levi, Professor of Criminology, Cardiff University
- Richard Martin, Deputy Assistant Commissioner, Metropolitan Police and National Police Chiefs' Council lead for International Criminality Portfolio
Possible topics for discussion
The Committee will explore a number of issues with the witness including:
- What, if anything, will the UK lose when it no longer has the ability to opt into JHA measures?
- Will its inability to opt into new measures have an appreciable effect on operational capacity?
- What avenues will be open to the UK to scrutinise or influence JHA measures during transition, once it loses its seats in Council and the European Parliament?
- What is the likelihood that other Member States will take advantage of the provisions in the Withdrawal Agreement to “urge” the UK to opt into JHA measures? How would this work in practice: would there need to be a vote in Council?
- Will the opt-in provisions of the Withdrawal Agreement apply to measures with JHA content, but without a JHA legal basis? Is there the possibility that the EU could, once the UK becomes a third country, insist that the UK take part in measures that it had previously opted out of on the grounds that they contained JHA content? What would be the operational consequences of such a course of action?
More news on: Parliament, government and politics, Parliament, Crime, civil law, justice and rights, European Union, Asylum, immigration and nationality, Crime, House of Lords news, Lords news, Committee news, Exiting the European Union
Share this page