Read transcripts of debates in both Houses
Produced by Commons Library, Lords Library and Parliamentary Office Science and Technology
Search for Members by name, postcode, constituency and party
Learn about their experience, knowledge and interests
Celebrating people who have made Parliament a positive, inclusive working environment
Four staff networks for people to discuss and consider issues.
2018 marks 100 years since some women, and all men, could vote. Find out how you can join in
Sign up for the Your Parliament newsletter to find out how you can get involved
Take a tour of Parliament and enjoy a delicious afternoon tea by the River Thames
See some of the sights you’ll encounter on a tour of Parliament
Book a school visit, classroom workshop or teacher-training session
Access videos, worksheets, lesson plans and games
Informal pre-laying scrutiny of affirmative instruments to be laid before both Houses
Affirmative instruments falling within the remit of the JCSI can be considered by the Committee’s legal advisers in the House of Lords in advance of their formal laying. This informal pre-laying scrutiny can minimise delay between the laying of an instrument and its consideration by the JCSI, and reduce the need for it to be considered at more than one meeting of the JCSI. There is no legal or procedural obligation to submit drafts of instruments for informal pre-laying scrutiny, but those Departments which have sufficiently robust internal arrangements in place for the quality assurance of their affirmative instruments are at liberty to do so.
Further details – about the practical arrangements for informal pre-laying scrutiny, the conditions on which it is provided, and the timetables for laying affirmative instruments and their subsequent consideration by the JCSI – are accessible via the link below.
Separate arrangements apply in relation to the advance checking by the Committee’s legal advisers in the House of Commons of drafts of affirmative instruments to be laid before the House of Commons only, and the extent to which they may be prepared to provide advance guidance on specific elements of non-affirmative instruments.