Read transcripts of debates in both Houses
Produced by Commons Library, Lords Library and Parliamentary Office Science and Technology
Search for Members by name, postcode, constituency and party
Learn about their experience, knowledge and interests
Celebrating people who have made Parliament a positive, inclusive working environment
Four staff networks for people to discuss and consider issues.
Contact your MP or a Member of the House of Lords about an issue that matters to you
Sign up for the Your Parliament newsletter to find out how you can get involved
Take a tour of Parliament and enjoy a delicious afternoon tea by the River Thames
See some of the sights you’ll encounter on a tour of Parliament
Book a school visit, classroom workshop or teacher-training session
Access videos, worksheets, lesson plans and games
Public Accounts Committee
Report published 14 February 2019. Government response published May 2019.
The need for an Excess Vote arises when a government department or body has incurred expenditure or other use of resources upon an existing service beyond the amounts authorised for it during the financial year in question, or where there is no proper parliamentary authority for the service.
When the exact amount of the excess expenditure or other use of resources has been ascertained on the completion of the audit of the Departmental Resource Accounts, the Comptroller & Auditor General makes a report to the House. His findings come before the Committee of Public Accounts, which, after an examination of the explanation provided by the department-in-question, submits its own report to the House, setting out the reasons and stating any objections (if any) to the excess being approved.
In 2017-18 one body breached its expenditure limit: the UK Supreme Court. This inquiry therefore will call in front of the Committee the UK Supreme Court to examine why and to hear further detail on the reasons they breached their expenditure limit. Subsequent to the evidence session, we will issue a report examining the reasons that the Supreme Court exceeded its voted provisions and stating whether or not the Committee has an objection to Parliament providing the necessary amount.
Evidence given by Mark Ormerod, Accounting Officer, UK Supreme Court, and Joyti Mackintosh, Finance Director, UK Supreme Court
There are currently no public meetings scheduled.