Read transcripts of debates in both Houses
Produced by Commons Library, Lords Library and Parliamentary Office Science and Technology
Search for Members by name, postcode, constituency and party
Learn about their experience, knowledge and interests
Celebrating people who have made Parliament a positive, inclusive working environment
Four staff networks for people to discuss and consider issues.
Contact your MP or a Member of the House of Lords about an issue that matters to you
Sign up for the Your Parliament newsletter to find out how you can get involved
Explore the Houses of Parliament on this virtual tour
Sign up to our newsletter for regular updates about visiting
Book a school visit, classroom workshop or teacher-training session
Access videos, worksheets, lesson plans and games
From the Parliamentary Collections
Clause Two of the Parliament Bill reflected the principal subject of dissension within the Lords: ‘Restriction of the powers of the House of Lords as to bills other than money bills’. The clause faced a barrage of amendments, a few of which are pictured here, during its passage through the House of Lords. The Parliament Bill proposed that if a bill was rejected in three consecutive Parliamentary sessions by the Lords, it would be given Royal Assent without their consent. The duration of Parliament would also be shortened from seven to five years. The Earl of Malmesbury proposed an amendment to this clause at committee stage to try and retain some of the influence the Lords had on the passage of legislation. At the time of this debate many peers feared that the Parliament Bill was tantamount to an unofficial written constitution.
Find out more about the Parliamentary Archives