Guide to the House of Lords Code of Conduct

Published 24 April 2017

The following Guide to the Code of Conduct was set out in the 2nd report of the Committee for Privileges, session 2009–10 (HL Paper 81), adopted by resolution on 16 March 2010 and amended by resolution on 9 November 2011, 6 March 2014, 13 May 2014, 24 March 2015, 25 February 2016, 9 February 2017 and 3 April 2017

Contents

 1. This Guide explains the application of the House of Lords Code of Conduct. Its purpose is to help members discharge the duties that the Code places on them. The House has adopted this Guide by resolution and it is binding on all members.

2. The operation of the Code is overseen by the Sub-Committee on Lords’ Conduct, a sub-committee of the Committee for Privileges and Conduct. The Sub-Committee is supported by the Registrar of Lords’ Interests, who is responsible for maintaining the Register of Lords’ Interests.

3. No written guidance can provide for all circumstances: when in doubt members should seek the advice of the Registrar of Lords’ Interests. The Registrar consults the Sub-Committee when necessary. A member who acts on the advice of the Registrar in determining what the member is required to register or declare as a relevant interest fully satisfies the requirements of the Code of Conduct as regards registration or declaration. While the Registrar also advises on participation in parliamentary proceedings where interests are concerned, the final responsibility for deciding whether or not to participate in proceedings rests with the member concerned.

4. The procedure for enforcing the Code of Conduct is described later in this Guide. In summary, responsibility for investigating alleged breaches of the Code rests with the House of Lords Commissioner for Standards, who is an independent officer appointed by the House as a whole. Following her investigation, the Commissioner reports to the Sub-Committee on Lords’ Conduct her findings of fact in cases where she has upheld the complaint and remedial action has not been agreed with the member concerned. The Sub-Committee reviews the Commissioner’s findings, may comment on them and, where appropriate, recommends a sanction. The reports of the Commissioner and Sub-Committee are presented to the Committee for Privileges and Conduct, and the member concerned has a right of appeal against both the Commissioner’s findings and any recommended sanction. Having heard any appeal, the Committee for Privileges and Conduct reports to the House and the final decision rests with the House. In cases where the Commissioner has dismissed the complaint or where remedial action has been agreed, the Commissioner’s reports are normally published only on the Commissioner’s webpages on the parliamentary website. However, she has discretion to submit such a report to the Committee for Privileges and Conduct.

5. Ministers of the Crown who are members of the House of Lords are subject to the Code of Conduct by virtue of their membership of the House. Ministers are also subject to further guidelines and requirements set out in the “Ministerial Code” published by the Cabinet Office. The Cabinet Office, not the House of Lords, enforces the Ministerial Code.
The remainder of this Guide is divided into six sections:
• general principles and rules of conduct;
• registration of interests;
• declaration of interests;
• use of facilities and services;
• financial support;
• enforcement.

Personal honour

6. In accordance with paragraph 5 of the Code of Conduct, members are required to sign an undertaking to abide by the Code as part of the ceremony of taking the oath upon introduction and at the start of each Parliament. A member who has taken the oath but who has not signed the undertaking is therefore deemed to have breached the Code, and it will be for the Sub-Committee on Lords’ Conduct to consider an appropriate sanction.

7. Members are required both “to comply with the Code of Conduct” (paragraph 8(a)), and to act always “on their personal honour” (paragraph 8(b)). The term “personal honour” has been explained by the Committee for Privileges as follows:
“The term ‘personal honour’ has been used within the House for centuries to describe the guiding principles that govern the conduct of members; its meaning has never been defined, and has not needed definition, because it is inherent in the culture and conventions of the House. These change over time, and thus any definition of ‘personal honour’, while it might achieve temporary ‘legal certainty’, would quickly become out-moded … the term ‘personal honour’ is ultimately an expression of the sense of the House as a whole as to the standards of conduct expected of individual members … members cannot rely simply on their own personal sense of what is honourable. They are required to act in accordance with the standards expected by the House as a whole. ‘Personal honour’ is thus … a matter for individual members, subject to the sense and culture of the House as a whole.” [1]

8. A member who expresses a clear willingness to breach the Code (for example, by attempting to negotiate an agreement to provide parliamentary services in return for payment) demonstrates a failure to act on his or her personal honour, and is thus in breach of paragraph 8(b) of the Code.

9. The Code of Conduct has been agreed by resolution of the House, with a view to providing guidance for members and the public as to the standards of conduct the House expects of its members in the discharge of their parliamentary duties. But a written Code can never cover every eventuality. Paragraphs 8(a) and 8(b) of the Code, taken together, mean that members are required not only to obey the letter of the rules, but to act in accordance with the spirit of those rules and the sense of the House. This includes the rules agreed by the House in respect of financial support for members or the facilities of the House. In addition to the specific rules on registration and declaration of interests, there is a more general obligation upon members to bear in mind the underlying purpose of the Code as set out in paragraph 3(b), namely, to provide “openness and accountability”.

The “general principles of conduct”

10. Paragraph 9 of the Code requires members of the House to observe the seven general principles of conduct set out by the Committee on Standards in Public Life. These principles apply to all aspects of public life, and provide the context within which the House of Lords Code of Conduct is read and implemented.

11. Complaints will not be entertained solely on the basis of alleged failures to abide by the seven principles (unsupported by specific evidence of a breach of the Code). However, these principles are taken into account when investigating any alleged breach of the provisions in other sections of the Code. Thus, for example, an allegation that a member failed to register a relevant interest would be investigated in the context of the general duty of “honesty”, namely that “Holders of public office should be truthful”.

Participation in parliamentary proceedings

12. In accordance with paragraph 15 of the Code a member with a relevant interest is free to take part in the public business of the House subject to:
• the rules on financial inducements and parliamentary influence (paragraph 8 of the Code);
• the rule on paid advocacy (paragraph 14 of the Code);
• the rules on the registration and declaration of interests (paragraphs 10–12 of the Code); and
• the resolution of any conflict between personal and public interest in favour of the public interest (paragraph 7 of the Code).

13. More generally, a member who is unsure whether or not to participate in parliamentary proceedings in relation to which he or she has relevant interests should consider the following factors:
• the nature of the proceeding itself. There would, for instance, be more latitude in the case of a general debate than in proposing or voting on an amendment to legislation. Members with financial interests that are relevant to private legislation should exercise particular caution, and seek advice before deciding to participate in proceedings on that legislation. [2]
• the nature of the member’s intended contribution. A speech urging Government investment in a sector in which the member had a financial interest might be open to misconstruction, whereas a speech canvassing issues of more general interest would not.

14. Members may consult the Registrar on these matters, but as paragraph 25 of the Code makes clear, “the final responsibility for deciding whether or not to participate in proceedings to which that interest is relevant rests with the member concerned.”

Financial inducements and parliamentary influence

15. Members are required under paragraph 7 of the Code to base their actions on consideration of the public interest. Acceptance of financial inducement as an incentive or reward for exercising parliamentary influence would necessarily contravene this principle. Paragraph 8(c) of the Code therefore states that members “must never accept or agree to accept any financial inducement as an incentive or reward for exercising parliamentary influence”.

16. Paragraph 8(d) of the Code describes the specific application of the principles described in paragraphs 7 and 8(c): members “must not seek to profit from membership of the House by accepting or agreeing to accept payment or other incentive or reward in return for providing parliamentary advice or services.”

17. Members of the House of Lords have a wide range of outside interests and careers and the House thrives on their expertise. The Code in no way seeks either to curtail these interests or careers, or to discourage members from drawing on the knowledge and expertise so gained in their parliamentary work. It is thus entirely appropriate for a member of the House also to work in any non-parliamentary sphere of activity, for example as chairman or director of a company; as a member or chief executive of a non-departmental public body; as an officer of a trade union; as a doctor or lawyer. Moreover, it is not only permissible, but desirable, that such members, having declared their employment and other interests, should contribute to debate on issues to which these interests are relevant.

18. At the same time, in their parliamentary work, and whenever they act in their capacity as parliamentarians, members are required to base their actions solely upon consideration of the public interest. Members thus have a responsibility to maintain a clear distinction between their outside interests and their parliamentary work. It is incompatible with the maintenance of this distinction for a member, by offering parliamentary advice or services to paying clients, to seek to profit from membership of the House. The Code therefore prohibits members from accepting payment in return for parliamentary advice or services.

19. The prohibition from accepting payment in return for parliamentary advice means that members may not act as paid parliamentary consultants, advising outside organisations or persons on process, for example how they may lobby or otherwise influence the work of Parliament. The following is not parliamentary advice:
• advice on public policy and current affairs;
• advice in general terms about how Parliament works; and
• media appearances, journalism, books, public lectures and speeches.

20. Although a member may never provide parliamentary advice in return for payment, a member may exceptionally give parliamentary advice to an organisation or person with whom the member has a financial interest, provided that the member can demonstrate that:
• he or she does not receive payment or benefit in return for the provision of parliamentary advice or services. The member should, if challenged, be able clearly to show that the payment or benefit is provided in return for some non-parliamentary advice or service which the member provides; the member should, where possible, ensure that contractual agreements specifically exclude the provision of parliamentary advice or services; and
• the payment or benefit which the member does receive is not substantially due to membership of the House, but is by reason of personal expertise or experience gained substantially outside Parliament; and that the member was, or would have been, appointed to the position without being a member of the House.

21. The prohibition on accepting payment in return for parliamentary services means that members may not, in return for payment or other incentive or reward, assist outside organisations or persons in influencing members of either House, ministers or officials. This includes seeking by means of participation in proceedings of the House to confer exclusive benefit upon the organisation (the “no paid advocacy rule”); or making use of their position to lobby, or to help others to lobby, members of either House, ministers or officials, by whatever means. A member may never provide parliamentary services in return for payment or other incentive or reward (regardless of whether the member intends to register and declare the interest).

22. Members may work for or hold financial interests in organisations such as representative bodies, trade associations or organisations involved in parliamentary lobbying on behalf of clients (such as public relations and law firms). However, in accordance with paragraph 8(d) of the Code of Conduct, members themselves are prohibited from personally offering parliamentary advice or services to clients, both directly and indirectly.

“Paid advocacy”

23. Paragraph 8(d) of the Code states that a member “must not seek to profit from membership of the House by accepting or agreeing to accept payment or other incentive or reward in return for providing parliamentary advice or services.” Paragraph 14 of the Code states that a member “must not act as a paid advocate in any proceeding of the House; that is to say, he or she must not seek by parliamentary means to confer exclusive benefit on an outside body or person from which he or she receives payment or reward.”

24. The “exclusive benefit” principle would mean, for instance, that a member who was paid by a pharmaceutical company would be barred from seeking to confer benefit exclusively upon that company by parliamentary means. The way in which the benefit is conferred should be interpreted broadly. All proceedings of the House are included, for instance:
• tabling a motion or an amendment to legislation;
• voting in a division;
• speaking in debate;
• asking written or oral questions; and
• deliberation within a select committee.

25. The nature of the “exclusive benefit”, on the other hand, should be interpreted narrowly. The same member would not be debarred from tabling an amendment, speaking or voting on matters relevant to, for instance, the pharmaceutical sector as a whole; National Health Service spending on drugs; or Government policy on drug licensing and patents.

26. The term “outside body” includes any registrable client of such a body (see below, paragraph 60).

27. A member who has a financial interest in, or receives a financial benefit from, a representative organisation, such as a trade association, trade union, staff association, professional body, charity or issue-related lobby group, may not advocate measures for the exclusive benefit of that organisation or the trade, industry or interest that it represents; nor speak or act in support of a campaign exclusively for the benefit of the representative organisation or its membership (e.g. a campaign for special tax relief, or for a specific programme of development). But the member may speak or act in support of a campaign that is of interest to the representative organisation, but is also of wider application (for instance, in the case of a charity for cancer research, a campaign for the prohibition of smoking).

28. A member who seeks to confer benefit on an organisation in which he or she has a financial interest, but who considers that this does not constitute an “exclusive benefit”, should make it clear in debate how he or she is acting not only in the interest of the organisation, but also the wider sector or community of which that organisation forms a part.

29. Paragraphs 8(c) and 8(d) of the Code (the prohibitions of payment for exercising parliamentary influence and of payment for providing parliamentary advice and services) and paragraph 14 of the Code (the prohibition of paid advocacy for exclusive benefit) do not apply to the Lords Spiritual, to ministers of the Crown, or to members or employees of non-departmental public bodies (whether commercial or non-commercial in character) in relation to those specific roles. Members and employees of public boards may take part in proceedings affecting the boards of which they are members or employees, subject to the usual rules on declaration of interests.

30. Paragraphs 8(c), 8(d) and 14 of the Code do not apply to members of the House acting as counsel on behalf of clients before private bill committees or the Committee for Privileges and Conduct. Nor do they apply to members appearing personally or on behalf of outside organisations as witnesses before select committees of either House.

Guidance on dealing with lobbyists

31. The House has agreed the following guidance for members on dealing with lobbyists.

32. The Committee on Standards in Public Life has concluded that lobbying has an important part to play in securing “the democratic right to make representations to government and to have access to the policymaking process [which] is fundamental to the proper conduct of public life and the development of sound policy.” [3] Many organisations play an important role in informing members of the House of Lords. However, some lobbying can give rise to a suspicion of improper influence over Parliament. Members must have regard to such public perceptions. Members’ dealings with lobbyists should always be governed by the principles of integrity and openness.

33. Members should take particular care not to give the impression of giving greater weight to representations because they come from paid lobbyists; representations should be given such weight as they deserve based on their intrinsic merit. Members must in their dealings with lobbyists observe the prohibitions on paid advocacy and on the provision of parliamentary advice or services for payment or other reward. Members should decline all but the most insignificant or incidental hospitality, benefit or gift offered by a lobbyist.

34. Under the Code, members are required to register in the Register of Lords’ Interests all relevant interests. The compilation and maintenance of the Register is undertaken by the Registrar of Lords’ Interests.

35. The purpose of the Register is to assist in openness and accountability by enabling members to make clear what are the interests that might be thought by a reasonable member of the public to influence their actions, speeches or votes in Parliament, or actions taken in their capacity as members of the House of Lords. The registration form specifies 10 categories of registrable interest, which are described below.

36. Relevant interests may be financial or non-financial. The key consideration in determining relevance in respect of both registration and declaration of an interest is that the interest might be thought by a reasonable member of the public to influence the way in which a member of the House of Lords discharges his or her parliamentary duties. In the case of registration, this means the member’s parliamentary duties in general; in the case of declaration, his or her duties in respect of the particular matter under discussion.

37. A “reasonable member of the public” is taken to mean an impartial and well-informed person, who judges all the relevant facts in an objective manner.

38. Members of the House of Lords are required to complete a registration form and submit it to the Registrar of Lords’ Interests within one month of taking their seat. Members returning to the House at the start of a Parliament having been on leave of absence at the end of the previous Parliament are required to register interests within one month of taking the oath in the new Parliament. It is the responsibility of members to keep their entry up-to-date by notifying changes in their registrable interests within one month of each change occurring. Failure to do so breaches the Code of Conduct. Members are encouraged to correspond with the Registrar by email: [email protected]

39. Any member having a registrable interest which has not been registered shall not undertake any action, speech or proceeding of the House (save voting) to which the interest would be relevant until they have registered the interest. In cases where members vote in a division where they have a relevant interest which they have yet to register, they must register the interest within 24 hours of the division.

40. Members are responsible for making a full disclosure of their interests, and if they have relevant financial interests which do not fall clearly into one or other of the specific categories, they are nonetheless expected to register them, if necessary under category 9 (miscellaneous financial interests).

41. Any reference in this Guide to a spouse includes a member’s civil partner or cohabitee. Registration of a spouse’s interests is required in certain cases. However, registration of the interests of a relative or friend is not required. Members may, at their discretion, declare such interests where they consider them to be relevant to the particular matter in hand, but they are not generally relevant to a member’s parliamentary conduct as a whole and are thus excluded from the Register.

42. All interests stay on the Register for one year after the date on which the interest ceased.

The value of interests required to be registered

43. All single benefits of whatever kind which fall into any of the following categories, and which exceed £500 in value, should be registered in the appropriate category (unless a different threshold is specified in the relevant category). All benefits received from the same source in the course of a calendar year, which cumulatively amount to more than £500 in value (or, in the case of category 8, £140), should also be registered. When there is uncertainty as to whether a single benefit or cumulative benefits exceed the threshold, members should err on the side of registration.

44. Interests below £500 (or the relevant threshold) in value are not required to be registered, unless (a) they fall into one of various categories of non-financial interests for which registration is mandatory; or (b) they could be thought by a reasonable member of the public to affect the way in which a member of the House of Lords discharges his or her parliamentary duties.

45. If a member considers that any benefit he or she has received, though falling below the value of £500 (or the relevant threshold), should be registered, the member should seek the advice of the Registrar. If, after taking the advice of the Registrar, the member still considers that the interest should be registered, he or she may register it in the appropriate category.

46. Financial interests below £500 in value may also be declared.

Publication of the Register

47. The Register is updated daily when the House is sitting, and is published online at www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld/ldreg.htm.

48. Previous editions of the Register are also available online.

Category 1: Directorships

Remunerated directorships in public and private companies, including non-executive directorships, and including directorships which are not directly remunerated, but where remuneration is paid through another company in the same group.

49. In this category, and in others, “remuneration” includes not only salaries and fees, but also the receipt of any taxable expenses, allowances or benefits, such as the provision of a company car. Members should register the name of the company in which the directorship is held and give a broad indication of the company’s business, where this is not self-evident from its name. Directly remunerated directorships of companies which are not trading should be registered. Members must register under this category the precise source of each individual payment made in relation to any directorship and the nature of the work carried on in return for that payment, except where disclosure of the information would be contrary to any established professional duty of privacy or confidentiality.

50. In addition to any remunerated directorships, members are required to register under this category any directorships which are themselves unremunerated but where either (a) remuneration is paid through another company in the same group where the companies in question are associated; or (b) the company concerned is a subsidiary of another company in which the member concerned holds remunerated directorships. Other unremunerated directorships should be registered under category 10 (non-financial interests) so that in one category or another all directorships should be registered.

51. The amount of remuneration in respect of interests falling within this category is not disclosed. The contract does not need to be deposited with the Registrar.

Category 2: Remunerated employment etc.

Employment, office, trade, profession or vocation which is remunerated or in which the member has any pecuniary interest.

52. All employment outside the House and any sources of remuneration which do not fall clearly within any other category should be registered here. When registering employment, members should state the employing organisation, the nature of its business (where this is not self-evident), the nature of the post that they hold in the organisation and the precise source of each individual payment made for services personally provided by the member (except where disclosure of the information would be contrary to any established professional duty of privacy or confidentiality). “Employing organisation” includes partnerships and limited liability partnerships (LLPs).

53. Members who have paid posts as consultants or advisers should indicate the nature of the consultancy or advice given, for example “management consultant”, “legal adviser” or “public affairs consultant”. They should, in the case of public affairs consultancies, give careful consideration to paragraph 8(d) of the Code and the accompanying guidance, and should also list their clients under category 3.

54. Occasional income or benefits from speeches, lecturing, broadcasting or journalism which exceeds £1,000 in the course of a calendar year from a single source should be registered under this category and the source should be identified.

55. Membership of Lloyd’s should be registered under this category. Members who have resigned from Lloyd’s should continue to register their interest as long as syndicates in which they have participated continue to have years of account which are open or in run-off. Members of Lloyd’s are also required to disclose the categories of insurance business which they are underwriting.

56. Members who have previously practised a profession may register that profession under this category with a bracketed remark such as “[non-practising]” after the entry.

57. Members are not required to register pension arrangements (save for certain investments in self-invested personal pensions—see paragraph 67), unless conditions are attached to the continuing receipt of the pension that a reasonable member of the public might regard as likely to influence their conduct as parliamentarians. Such conditions attaching to pensions from European Union institutions do not normally require the pension to be registered or declared in proceedings in the House.

58. Membership of the House is not to be registered under this category.

59. The amount of remuneration in respect of interests falling within this category is not disclosed. The contract does not need to be deposited with the Registrar.

Category 3: Public affairs advice and services to clients

In respect of remunerated interests registered in categories 1 or 2, any provision to clients of public affairs advice and services.

60. The types of services covered here are those falling under the broad heading of public affairs advice and services. Where a member receives remuneration from an organisation engaged in such work, the member should list any of those clients with whom the member has a continuing relationship on behalf of the organisation which could not fairly be described as immaterial. Members with an interest in this category should pay particular regard to paragraphs 15 to 22 (especially paragraph 19).

61. All such clients should be listed, along with a broad indication of their business, where this is not self-evident.

62. A member who has clients in a professional capacity which does not relate to public affairs (for example, as an accountant, doctor or lawyer) is not required to register those clients, provided that the member can demonstrate that the member does not provide public affairs advice and services to the clients.

Category 4: Shareholdings

(a) Any shareholding amounting to a controlling interest in a company. (b) Any shareholding not amounting to a controlling interest, but exceeding £50,000 in value.(c) If the member is on the central Register of People with Significant Control of a company, a statement to that effect with the name or names of the companies or organisations in question.

63. Members should include all such shareholdings held, either personally, or with or on behalf of their spouse or dependent children, in any public or private company. Members should not specify the value of the shares or the percentage of shares in a company that are owned, other than by indicating whether the shareholding falls under category 4(a) or 4(b).

64. For each registrable shareholding, the entry should state the name of the company and briefly indicate the nature of the company’s business, where this is not self-evident.

65. The value of a shareholding is determined by the market price of the share at the time it is first registered, and thereafter by the market price on 5 April. This means that after Register entries relating to shareholdings are first registered they need to be updated only once a year, within one month of 5 April. The Registrar should however be informed of the purchase or disposal of registrable shareholdings within one month of the date of the purchase or sale. If the market price cannot be ascertained (e.g. because the company is unquoted and there is no market in the shares), the member should decide whether to register it on the basis of its estimated value. Interests in shareholdings include share options.

66. Holdings in a collective investment vehicle (including unit trusts, investment trusts and investment companies with variable capital (ICVCs)) are not generally registrable. Members may, however, consider registration in this category in appropriate cases, such as sector-specific vehicles. Members who are beneficiaries of trusts should treat them in the same way. Holdings in blind trusts are exempt from registration.

67. Pensions are not in themselves registrable (see paragraph 57 above), but identifiable holdings in a self-invested personal fund are registrable in either this category or category 5 as appropriate if of registrable value.

68. Shareholdings in companies the purpose of which is to own the freehold of a personal residence of a member or of a property registered in another category are not registrable. Holdings of UK and other governments’ stock, gilts, bonds, premium bonds, national savings and the like are not registrable. Corporate bondholdings are not registrable.

69. Members should register in category 4(c) if they are on the central Register of People with Significant Control of a company, which is maintained by Companies House. A statement to that effect should be registered, along with the name or names of the companies or organisations in question.

70. Information should be registered in category 4(c) within one month of it appearing on the Companies House register.

Category 5: Land and property

Any land or property (a) which has a capital value of more than £250,000 (but excluding any personal residences of members and their spouses), or (b) from which an income of more than £5,000 a year is derived.

71. Only the nature of the property and a general indication of its location should be indicated (e.g. “farm in Norfolk”, “residential holdings in Birmingham” and so on); the value of the property and the income received need not be registered. No property that is used for personal residential purposes need be registered, unless it falls under part (b).

Category 6: Sponsorship

Any form of financial or material support received as a member of the House of Lords, the value of which amounts to more than £500, from a single source, whether as a single donation, multiple donations or services in kind.

72. This category covers sponsorship or other forms of support by companies, trade unions, professional bodies, trade associations, charities, universities, other organisations and individuals. It covers any support from which the member receives financial or material benefit in his or her role as a member of the House of Lords. The types of support which should be registered include the services of a research assistant or secretary whose salary, in whole or in part, is met by an outside organisation or individual; and the provision of accommodation.

Category 7: Overseas visits

Overseas visits made by the member or the member’s spouse substantially arising out of membership of the House, except where the cost of the visit was wholly borne by the member or by United Kingdom public funds.

73. Members should enter in the Register the date, destination and purpose of the visit and the name of the government, organisation or individual which met the cost. Where only part of the cost was borne by an outside source (for example the cost of accommodation but not the cost of travel), those details should be stated briefly. When an overseas visit was arranged by a registered all-party parliamentary group or by a party backbench group, it is not sufficient to name the group as the sponsor of the visit: the government, organisation or person ultimately meeting the cost should be specified.

74. The following categories of visit, together with any hospitality associated with such a visit and available to all participants, are exempt from registration:
• visits which are paid for by, or which are undertaken on behalf of, Her Majesty’s Government, or which are made on behalf of an international organisation of which the United Kingdom Government is a member;
• visits abroad with, or on behalf of, a select committee of the House, including a joint committee;
• visits undertaken on behalf of, or under the auspices of, the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association, the Inter-Parliamentary Union, the British–Irish Parliamentary Assembly, the British–American Parliamentary Group, the Council of Europe, the Westminster Foundation for Democracy, the NATO Parliamentary Assembly or the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly;
• Peers’ Representative Travel, paid for by the House of Lords Overseas Office;
• official travel by the Lord Speaker or his representative;
• visits to European Union parliaments and institutions paid for by the House on the authority of the Clerk of the Parliaments;
• visits arranged and paid for wholly by a political party;
• visits paid for wholly by an institution of the European Union or by a political group of the European Parliament.

75. Visits which are unconnected with membership of the House (e.g. those made as part of the member’s employment or profession), or the cost of which does not exceed £500 in value, are also exempt from registration.

76. An entry made in this category will remain on the Register for a period of one year from the date on which the visit was made.

Category 8: Gifts, benefits and hospitality

Any gift to the member or the member’s spouse or partner, or any other material benefit, of a value greater than £140, from any company, organisation or person, within the UK or overseas, which relates substantially to membership of the House. [4]

77. Any gift, or other benefit, which relates substantially to membership of the House and which is either given free of charge or provided at a cost below that generally available to members of the public, should be registered whenever the value or potential value of the gift or benefit is greater than £140, unless the member gives the gift to charity within the period required for registration. Benefits include loans, tickets to cultural and sporting events, hospitality, travel and accommodation upgrades. The date of receipt should also be registered. A gift or benefit available to all members should not be registered.

78. Gifts and other benefits from the same source in the course of a calendar year the gift of which related substantially to membership of the House and which cumulatively are of a value greater than £140 should be registered, even if each single gift or benefit is of lesser value.

79. Hospitality provided by Her Majesty’s Government, any of the devolved institutions in Scotland, Wales or Northern Ireland, the Greater London Authority, local authorities, non-departmental public bodies or health authorities, is exempt from registration.

80. Gifts and material benefits that do not relate substantially to membership of the House are exempt from registration.

81. Gifts and material benefits should be registered within one month of receipt; the entry will remain on the Register for a period of one year from the date of receipt.

82. Gifts received by the Lord Speaker in connection with the performance of his public duties are registered separately, irrespective of value, in a register maintained by his private office.

Category 9: Miscellaneous financial interests

Any relevant financial interest not falling within one of the above categories, but which might be thought by a reasonable member of the public to influence a member’s parliamentary conduct.

83. The purpose of this category is to enable members to enter in the Register any financial interests of a value greater than £500 that they consider to be relevant, but which do not obviously fall within any of the other categories. The advice of the Registrar should be sought before entering any interest in this category.

Category 10: Non-financial interests

84. Certain non-financial interests may reasonably be thought to affect the way members of the House of Lords discharge their public duties and must therefore be registered in this category. The following non-financial interests are always relevant and therefore must be registered:
(a) unremunerated directorships or other regular employment;
(b) membership of public bodies such as hospital trusts, the governing bodies of universities, colleges or schools, local authorities and other spheres of government;
(c) trusteeships of museums, galleries or similar bodies;
(d) acting as an office-holder or trustee in pressure groups or trade unions; and
(e) acting as an office-holder or trustee in voluntary or not-for-profit organisations.

85. Other non-financial interests are not registrable or (unless the member thinks it appropriate) declarable. Such interests include: other trusteeships, for example of private estates; unpaid ordinary membership of voluntary organisations or pressure groups; membership of churches or other religious bodies or organisations. The Registrar is available to advise members in cases of uncertainty.

86. The following posts should not be registered: honorary fellowships in colleges and universities; other honorary posts; offices in political parties; patrons; ex officio positions in voluntary organisations (for instance, those held by the Lords Spiritual). There may however be occasions on which such interests should be declared.

87. The Code of Conduct states that members must “declare when speaking in the House, or communicating with ministers or public servants, any interest which is a relevant interest in the context of the debate or the matter under discussion.”

88. This provision should be interpreted broadly. Thus “speaking in the House” covers members’ participation in the work of select committees of the House. “Public servants” includes servants of the Crown, civil servants, employees of government agencies or non-departmental public bodies, and members, officers and employees of local authorities or other governmental bodies.

89. However, the provision should also be read in the context of paragraph 3(a) of the Code, which states that “the Code does not extend to members’ performance of duties unrelated to parliamentary proceedings, or to their private lives”. Where a member writes to a minister or other public servant in a private capacity, about matters unrelated to public policy or to parliamentary proceedings, no declaration is required.

Differences between registration and declaration

90. The House has two distinct but related methods for the disclosure of the relevant interests of its members: registration of interests in a Register which is open for public inspection; and declaration of interest in the course of debate in the House and in other contexts (for instance, when communicating with ministers). The main purpose of the Register is to give public notification on a continuing basis of those interests held by members that might reasonably be thought to have a general influence on their parliamentary conduct or actions. The main purpose of declaration of interest is to ensure that fellow members of the House, ministers, officials and the public are made aware, at the point at which the member participates in proceedings of the House or otherwise acts in a parliamentary capacity, of any present or expected future interest that might reasonably be thought relevant to that particular action by the member.

91. Thus declaration, like registration, is compulsory. Moreover, given the wide range of issues that may be the subject of debate, the duties imposed on members in respect of declaration are in some respects broader than those in respect of registration. However, whereas members are required by the Code of Conduct to publish all interests that might be thought to have a general influence on their conduct in the Register, members are under no obligation to speak in the House, or to communicate with ministers or public servants. Thus the duty to declare relevant interests, while broader than the duty of registration, is ultimately subject to the member’s decision to speak in a debate or write to a minister or public servant.

Form of declaration

92. Members should declare interests briefly, usually at the beginning of their speech. Declarations should wherever possible be comprehensible, specific and unambiguous, without either demanding prior knowledge of their audience or requiring reference to other documents. Members should not normally make a declaration simply by referring to “my interests which are published in the Register”.

93. However, during proceedings on oral questions, private notice questions and ministerial statements, a brief reference to the member’s interests in the Register suffices. During other time-limited proceedings, or where the advisory speaking time in a debate is short, members should not take up time by making lengthy declarations of interest. On such occasions if a member has multiple relevant interests it suffices for the declaration to indicate the nature of the interests.

94. Members should not take up the time of the House by declaring trivial, frivolous or irrelevant interests. They should bear in mind that the test of relevance is “whether the interest might be thought by a reasonable member of the public to influence the way in which a member of the House of Lords discharges his or her parliamentary duties” (Code, paragraph 11). The test of whether to declare is that set by the Code of Conduct and this Guide and not what other members declare in debate.

95. The subject-matter against which the relevance of an interest must be judged is normally the item of business as it appears on the order paper. Thus in the case of a bill, the subject-matter is the bill as a whole. A full declaration of any interests relevant to a bill should be made at least on the occasion of the member’s first intervention at each stage of the bill’s progress. Repetition of declarations of interest within committee and report stage is unnecessary. There may however be circumstances in which a further declaration is appropriate, for example if an interest which is tangential to the bill as a whole nevertheless has a strong relevance to a particular amendment.

Future or former interests

96. Declarable interests are usually current interests, but they may occasionally include relevant future interests. A relevant future interest is declarable if the member’s expectation has passed beyond vague hope or aspiration and reached the stage where there is a clear prospect that the interest will shortly arise. Former interests may exceptionally be declarable if, for example, they are comparatively recently held and might be thought to continue to influence the member in respect of the particular matter under discussion.

Declaration of non-financial interests

97. Members must declare relevant non-financial interests if they are in the Register of Lords’ Interests. Other relevant non-financial interests may be declared if the member thinks it appropriate.

98. A member serving on a select committee should declare any interests relevant to an inquiry or any other activity undertaken by that committee. The declaration should be made in writing to the committee clerk, and orally the first time the member speaks in public in the inquiry. A list of declared relevant interests is also published as an appendix to the committee’s report.

99. The principles governing participation, described in paragraphs 12–14 above, apply also to participation in the work of select committees.

100. Further advice on select committee work should be sought from the committee clerk in the first instance.

101. Members are required to draw attention to the existence of a relevant registered interest when tabling the following types of business:
• questions (for oral answer, written answer or for short debate);
• motions (including amendments to motions).

102. The responsibility for drawing attention to any relevant registered interest rests with the member concerned:
• the member must notify the staff of the Table Office of any relevant registered interest before tabling any item of business;
• if the member has such an interest, he or she must also specify which registered interest is affected.

103. When such an interest exists, the symbol “[I]” is printed after the member’s name in House of Lords Business. The Table Office then arranges for the publication of the interest by means of the online version of House of Lords Business.

104. If a member has a registrable interest which is yet to be registered, and wishes to table business to which that interest is relevant, the member should register the interest before tabling the business, [5] so that it appears in the online Register of Lords’ Interests in advance of publication of House of Lords Business.

105. An indication in House of Lords Business and on the order paper of the existence of a relevant registered interest does not affect a member’s duty to declare relevant interests orally, for instance when asking an oral question or moving a motion in the House or in Grand Committee.

106. Members of the House may claim a daily allowance for attendance and certain reimbursement expenses to support them in their parliamentary work. The House of Lords Commission is responsible for proposing rules on the financial support available to members, which are reported to and agreed by the House. The available support and the rules are set out in the Guide to financial support for members. Paragraph 10(c) of the Code of Conduct states that members shall “act in accordance with any rules agreed by the House in respect of financial support for members”. A breach of such rules therefore constitutes a breach of the Code of Conduct and could lead to an investigation by the House of Lords Commissioner for Standards. The Finance Director is responsible for the administration of the scheme. Any member may seek the written advice of the Finance Director before determining what use to make of the scheme. The responsibility for deciding what use to make of the scheme rests with the member concerned.

107. The House provides various facilities and services for members, most of which are paid for in full or subsidised by the public purse. These facilities and services are provided primarily to support members in their parliamentary work. The domestic committees are responsible for proposing rules on the use of facilities by members, and the key ones are reported to and agreed by the House. Paragraph 10(c) of the Code of Conduct states that members shall “act in accordance with any rules agreed by the House in respect of … the facilities of the House.” A breach of such rules therefore constitutes a breach of the Code of Conduct and could lead to an investigation by the House of Lords Commissioner for Standards. The rules on the use of facilities which have been agreed by the House are set out in two House Committee reports [6] which are in the Handbook on facilities and services for members and their staff. These reports also identify which official is responsible for the provision of each facility or service; a member who acts on the advice of that official in determining what use to make of a facility satisfies fully the requirements of the Code of Conduct in that regard.

108. The House of Lords is self-regulating and it is desirable for any member who considers that another member may be in breach of the Code promptly to draw it to the attention of the member concerned.

The House of Lords Commissioner for Standards

109. The House of Lords Commissioner for Standards may investigate alleged breaches of the Code, the rules governing members’ financial support and the rules governing the use of parliamentary facilities and services. A complaint made by a third party is the usual basis for the Commissioner to start an investigation. In exceptional circumstances however, and with the agreement of the Sub-Committee on Lords’ Conduct, she may start an investigation in the absence of a complaint, either at the request of the member concerned, or if by other means she becomes aware of evidence sufficient to establish a prima facie case that the Code of Conduct has been breached.

Making a complaint

110. If the complainant is a member of the House of Lords, the complaint should be raised in the first instance with the member complained against, or otherwise with that member’s party Leader or Chief Whip, or with the Convenor of the Crossbench Peers. Non-members wishing to make a complaint should normally first make their dissatisfaction known to the member concerned and give the member an opportunity to respond.

111. Any complaint alleging that a member of the House of Lords has breached the Code of Conduct, whether made by another member of the House of Lords or by someone outside the House, should be sent in writing to:
The House of Lords Commissioner for Standards
House of Lords
London SW1A 0PW

112. Complaints submitted by telephone or email will not be considered. The complainant should give a postal address, telephone number and, if available, email address for subsequent communication. The complainant must make clear in what respect the member may have breached the Code of Conduct and must supply as much evidence as the complainant can in support of the complaint.

113. In the interests of natural justice, the specific allegation should be made to the Commissioner in private and not publicised until the complaint has been finally determined.

Preliminary assessment

114. The Commissioner conducts a preliminary assessment of all complaints. The Commissioner will not without good reason consider either anonymous complaints or ones where the complainant is not prepared to have his name and complaint disclosed to the member whose conduct is criticised. She screens out complaints which fall outside the scope of the Code. She may choose not to consider complaints which are clearly trivial or vexatious, or which substantially repeat allegations which have already been the subject of inquiry (unless there is significant fresh evidence in their support). In making her preliminary assessment, the Commissioner considers the criteria in the following two paragraphs.

115. Matters within the Commissioner’s remit include:
• failure to register relevant interests;
• failure to declare relevant interests in the course of parliamentary business, including committee proceedings;
• breach of the rules on financial inducements and parliamentary influence and on paid advocacy;
• breach of the rules on the use of facilities and services and on financial support; and
• breach by members’ staff of the Code of Conduct for Members’ Staff.
116. Matters not within the Commissioner’s remit include:
• policy matters or a member’s views or opinions;
• the funding of political parties;
• alleged breaches of the separate code governing the conduct of Government ministers as ministers; and
• members’ non-parliamentary activities.

117. The Commissioner may not investigate a complaint about a former member of the House. If a member is under investigation when the member leaves the House the investigation terminates at that point.

118. If a member applies for leave of absence in order to avoid an impending investigation (or while an investigation is under way), the request may be refused. If the Commissioner decides to investigate a complaint about a member who is on leave of absence (in respect of conduct that occurred when the member was not on leave), the leave may if necessary be ended with immediate effect.

119. The complaint must usually be made within four years of the conduct complained of. In exceptional circumstances the Commissioner may investigate conduct which occurred more than four years before a complaint is made, provided that the Sub-Committee on Lords’ Conduct agrees and that it is satisfied that there is a strong public interest in the matter being investigated.

120. The complaint must also be supported by evidence sufficient to establish a prima facie case that the Code has been breached.

121. The Commissioner may continue an investigation into an alleged breach of the Code if the police or another agency are investigating a related allegation of criminal misconduct, but in such circumstances the Commissioner will not finalise her report on the case until the criminal process concludes. Before finalising her report the Commissioner will take account of any relevant issues which arose during the criminal process. An investigation will be suspended if related proceedings (criminal or civil) become sub judice (within the meaning of the House’s sub judice resolution).

122. Following her preliminary assessment, the Commissioner informs both the complainant and the member concerned whether or not she will investigate the complaint. If she has decided that the complaint does not merit investigation, she provides the complainant with a brief explanation of her reasons for dismissing the complaint. The Commissioner publishes a webpage setting out basic information about a case when she has decided to investigate a complaint.

The investigation: procedural safeguards

123. The Code of Conduct states that “In investigating and adjudicating allegations of non-compliance with this Code, the Commissioner, the Sub-Committee on Lords’ Conduct and the Committee for Privileges and Conduct shall act in accordance with the principles of natural justice and fairness.”

124. Proceedings are not adversarial, but inquisitorial in character. The Commissioner is an independent and impartial investigator, appointed by the House, whose task is to establish the facts of a case. She produces a report on each case, which includes her conclusions as to whether or not there has been a breach of the Code. If the complaint is upheld and no remedial action has been agreed with the member concerned her report is submitted to the Sub-Committee on Lords’ Conduct. If the complaint is not upheld or if remedial action has been agreed the Commissioner’s report is normally published only on her webpages on the parliamentary website. However, she has discretion to submit such a report to the Committee for Privileges and Conduct. This may be because of the particular seriousness of the allegation or because the case gives rise to matters of wider interest or relevance. In such instances the Committee for Privileges and Conduct reports the case to the House.

125. The member has a right of appeal from the Commissioner and Sub-Committee, first to the Committee for Privileges and Conduct and then to the House. The complainant has no right of appeal.

126. Members are expected to co-operate with any investigation into their conduct. They should supply written evidence as requested, and in their own name. Letters sent on their behalf by legal advisers or others will be disregarded. They may be accompanied to any meeting by a colleague, friend or legal adviser, but every effort is made to keep proceedings informal, and there is no expectation that they should be so accompanied. If they choose to bring a colleague, friend or adviser they are free to consult him or her off the record, but will be expected to answer for themselves (and not through the friend or adviser) any question put to them.

127. Complainants have no formal locus once an investigation is under way: they have no right to be called as a witness, though they are expected to co-operate with any investigation and to supply all the evidence in their possession when asked to do so. Nor do members accused of misconduct have any entitlement to cross-examine complainants, though they are given an opportunity to review and, if they so wish, challenge the factual basis of any evidence supplied by complainants or others.

128. The civil standard of proof is adopted at all stages in the enforcement process, not only by the Commissioner, but by the Sub-Committee on Lords’ Conduct and the Committee for Privileges and Conduct. Thus, in order to find against a member, the Commissioner will require at least that the allegation is proved on the balance of probabilities.

Parliamentary privilege

129. The Commissioner is an officer of the House of Lords and parliamentary privilege extends to her in carrying out her duties and to her reports. It also extends to witnesses and parties to her investigations. A complaint is however not regarded as covered by parliamentary privilege unless and until the Commissioner has decided to undertake an investigation.

130. From the point that the Commissioner decides to undertake an investigation all evidence and correspondence relating directly to the inquiry is covered by parliamentary privilege. It must remain confidential unless and until it is published. If such evidence or correspondence were to be published or disclosed to anyone else without the agreement of the Committee for Privileges and Conduct or the Commissioner, this would be a contempt of the House. An attempt to obstruct an investigation is a contempt of the House.

The investigation: process

131. The Commissioner first informs the member concerned of the nature of the complaint and provides copies of the evidence offered in support of it. She sets out the particular provisions of the Code that appear, either on the basis of the complaint, or her preliminary assessment of the facts, to have been breached, at the same time inviting the member to respond in writing with a full and accurate account of the matters in question.

132. After considering the member’s written submission, the Commissioner may decide either to dismiss the complaint or to agree remedial action with the member. Remedial action may be agreed if the complaint, though justified, is minor and is acknowledged by the member concerned. Remedial action involves “putting the record straight”, for instance by making an amendment to the Register; the member will also normally be expected to make a formal apology in writing to the chairman of the Sub-Committee on Lords’ Conduct. If the Commissioner and member agree remedial action, the Commissioner explains the circumstances and remedial action in her report on the case. The Commissioner informs the complainant of the action taken in response to the complaint.

133. If the member’s written response is not sufficient to enable the Commissioner either to dismiss the complaint or agree remedial action, the Commissioner may pursue the investigation by seeking further information, either from the member concerned or others, including the original complainant, third parties, or public or private bodies. Such information is usually requested in writing in the first instance, though in some circumstances the Commissioner may decide to interview witnesses, either informally or by means of formal oral evidence. The Commissioner holds her meetings with witnesses in private. In the case of informal interviews, a note is made of the meeting and all parties are subsequently asked to confirm its accuracy. In the case of formal oral evidence, a full transcript is taken. The Committee for Privileges and Conduct decides to what extent evidence is published.

134. If the complaint concerns non-declaration of a relevant interest and the Commissioner upholds the complaint, she will then examine whether there were other possible instances of non-declaration of that interest in the four years preceding the complaint. If other possible instances arise the Commissioner will invite the member to respond to them. The Commissioner will reach a finding on any such instances identified.

135. The Committee for Privileges and Conduct and its Sub-Committee on Lords’ Conduct have the power to send for persons, papers and records and may exercise this power as necessary in support of any investigation by the Commissioner.

Assessing the evidence

136. If the Commissioner’s investigation has uncovered material evidence that is at variance with the member’s version of events, she will put this to the member, who will have a chance to challenge it. Before finalising her report, the Commissioner will also share with the member a draft of those parts of her report dealing with issues of fact, so that the member has an opportunity to comment on it.

137. If, having considered the member’s comments, the Commissioner considers that there remain significant contested issues of fact, she will prepare her own account of the facts of the case, drawing attention to those points which are contested.

138. The Commissioner usually reports her findings in the following form:
• summary of the initial complaint and of the relevant elements of the Code of Conduct;
• brief account of the key facts in the case, with references to evidence as appropriate and with any contested points of fact highlighted;
• her findings with reasons as to whether or not the Code has been breached; and
• any evidence, written and oral.

Consideration by the Sub-Committee on Lords’ Conduct

139. In cases where the Commissioner upholds a complaint and remedial action has not been agreed, the Sub-Committee considers the Commissioner’s report and must report it without amendment to the Committee for Privileges and Conduct. The Sub-Committee, in its report, may comment on the Commissioner’s report and on the case. The task of the Sub-Committee is to recommend any appropriate action that the member should take to regularise the position (including repayment of money) and any sanction that the House should apply.

140. In the case of a breach of the Code, the options available to the Sub-Committee in its report to the Committee for Privileges and Conduct include:
• no action or sanction is appropriate.
• the Committee for Privileges and Conduct should recommend to the House that the member be required to take action to regularise the position.
• the Committee for Privileges and Conduct should recommend to the House that the member be required to make a personal statement of apology in the House.
• the Committee for Privileges and Conduct should recommend to the House that the member be suspended from the House. If the conduct concerned occurred on or after 26 June 2015, or if it occurred before 26 June 2015 but was not public knowledge before then, the suspension may be for any period of time. [7] If the conduct occurred before 26 June 2015 and was public knowledge before then, the suspension may be for a specified period of time not longer than the remainder of the current Parliament. [8]
• the Committee for Privileges and Conduct should recommend to the House that the member be denied access for a specified period of time to the system of financial support for members and/or denied access for a specified period to the facilities of the House. These sanctions can be applied for any period of time and may be applied in addition to a sanction of suspension. [9] 
• the Committee for Privileges and Conduct should recommend to the House that the member be expelled from the House. This recommended sanction is available if the conduct concerned occurred on or after 26 June 2015, or if it occurred before 26 June 2015 but was not public knowledge before then. [10]

Report to the Committee for Privileges and Conduct and appeal

141. In cases where the Commissioner upholds a complaint and remedial action has not been agreed, the Sub-Committee makes its report and that of the Commissioner to the Committee for Privileges and Conduct. At the same time as the report is made to the Committee for Privileges and Conduct, a copy is sent to the member concerned, who is informed of the deadline by which he may lodge an appeal to the Committee for Privileges and Conduct if the complaint has been upheld.

142. If the member does not appeal to the Committee for Privileges and Conduct in the event of a complaint being upheld, the Committee initially considers the sanction recommended by the Sub-Committee. If it endorses the sanction, it reports to the House accordingly. Alternatively and exceptionally, it can decide that the recommended sanction needs further consideration. If so, it then invites representations from the member concerned on the question of sanction. Having heard those representations, the committee decides whether to endorse, reduce or increase the recommended sanction.

143. If the member wishes to appeal, the member must do so in writing, setting out the grounds for the appeal and enclosing such supporting material as the member thinks appropriate. The appeal may be against either the Commissioner’s finding of a breach of the Code or the recommended sanction. A meeting will be scheduled to hear the appeal and the member will be given an opportunity to appear in person, if he or she so wishes. The Committee may also take evidence from the Commissioner.

144. On appeal, the Committee will not reopen the Commissioner’s investigation. Rather, members of the Committee will use their judgment to decide whether, on the balance of probabilities, they endorse the conclusions of the Commissioner; they will also consider whether the recommended sanction is appropriate. On appeal a recommended sanction may be endorsed, reduced or increased.

Report to the House

145. Where a case is referred to the Committee for Privileges and Conduct, either by the Sub-Committee or by the Commissioner, the Committee reports the case to the House.

146. Where a complaint is upheld, the Committee for Privileges and Conduct must seek the agreement of the House if it is proposed that the member be required to take action to regularise the position or that the member be sanctioned by suspension or expulsion, or that the member be denied access to the system of financial support or the facilities of the House.

147. In all cases where there has been an appeal to the Committee for Privileges and Conduct, the Committee will publish a report either upholding or dismissing the appeal. The reports from the Commissioner and Sub-Committee are annexed to the Committee’s report.

148. When the Committee reports to the House, the Committee clerk should show the member the report shortly before publication and send the complainant the report on publication.

Imprisonment of members

149. A member of the House of Lords who is sentenced to be imprisoned indefinitely or for more than one year ceases to be a member of the House [11] and is no longer subject to the House’s Code of Conduct.

150. The following paragraphs apply in cases where a member who has been sentenced to imprisonment continues to be a member of the House and therefore is subject to the Code.

151. A member sentenced to imprisonment in the United Kingdom for a term of up to and including one year (or given a suspended sentence of imprisonment in the United Kingdom of whatever length) is deemed to have breached the Code. The case is then referred to the Sub-Committee on Lords’ Conduct for it to recommend a sanction. The Sub-Committee may defer its consideration of a sanction if an appeal is lodged in the courts.

152. A member sentenced to imprisonment outside the United Kingdom (whether the sentence is suspended or not) is presumed to have breached the Code. The case is then referred to the Sub-Committee on Lords’ Conduct for it to consider whether the presumption should apply in that case and, if it should, what sanction to recommend. The member has the right to make representations to the Sub-Committee, and the Sub-Committee may take other evidence. If the sentence is for imprisonment for a term of more than one year, the Sub-Committee will defer its consideration of the case until any motion in the House that the member should cease to be a member [12]  is disposed of.

Notes

[1] Committee for Privileges (2nd report, session 2008–09, HL Paper 88).

[2] A member with an interest in the outcome of a private bill may not serve on the committee on the bill (Private Business Standing Order 96).

[3] Sixth report from the Committee on Standards in Public Life, Reinforcing Standards: Review of the First Report of the Committee on Standards in Public Life, Cm 4557-I, January 2000, paragraph 7.10.

[4] Further guidance on accepting gifts, benefits and hospitality is in Committee for Privileges and Conduct, Guidance to members on accepting gifts, benefits and hospitality (1st report, session 2015–16, HL Paper 14).

[5]  See paragraph 39 above.

[6]  House Committee, Banqueting rules (1st report, session 2014–15, HL Paper 8) and Rules Governing the Use of Facilities (2nd report, session 2009–10, HL Paper 47).

[7] See Standing Order 12, implementing section 1 of the House of Lords (Expulsion and Suspension) Act 2015.

[8]  See Committee for Privileges, The powers of the House of Lords in respect of its Members (First report, session 2008–09, HL Paper 87), agreed to by the House on 20 May 2009; and Standing Order 12(8).

[9]  See House Committee, Sanctions for Breaches of the Code of Conduct (First report, session 2013–14, HL Paper 91); agreed to by the House on 16 January 2014.

[10] See Standing Order 12, implementing section 1 of the House of Lords (Expulsion and Suspension) Act 2015.

[11] House of Lords Reform Act 2014, section 3. In the case of a conviction outside the United Kingdom, a resolution of the House is necessary to give effect to the expulsion.

[12] Under section 3(9) of the House of Lords Reform Act 2014.

Related links

Lords’ Conduct (Sub-Committee)

The Sub-Committee on Lords’ Conduct undertakes detailed consideration of matters relating to the Code of Conduct.