Read transcripts of debates in both Houses
Produced by Commons Library, Lords Library and Parliamentary Office Science and Technology
Search for Members by name, postcode, constituency and party
Learn about their experience, knowledge and interests
Celebrating people who have made Parliament a positive, inclusive working environment
Four staff networks for people to discuss and consider issues.
Contact your MP or a Member of the House of Lords about an issue that matters to you
Sign up for the Your Parliament newsletter to find out how you can get involved
Take a tour of Parliament and enjoy a delicious afternoon tea by the River Thames
See some of the sights you’ll encounter on a tour of Parliament
Book a school visit, classroom workshop or teacher-training session
Access videos, worksheets, lesson plans and games
The Archives Accommodation Programme has been set up to consider if we should relocate the Parliamentary Archives from its current home in Victoria Tower in the Palace of Westminster, to an alternative site. These Questions and Answers have been developed to provide information about the archives and about the programme.
The Parliamentary Archives is a shared House of Commons and House of Lords service located in the Victoria Tower and adjacent offices within the Palace of Westminster. It provides an archive and records management service for both Houses of Parliament. It cares for and makes available to the public a vast historic collection of documents dating back to 1497. It is the oldest parliamentary archive in the world.
The Archives Accommodation Programme is exploring options for the relocation of the Parliamentary Archives and its services. During the planned Restoration & Renewal of the Palace, whichever option is chosen, the Archives would need to be relocated to specialist temporary accommodation. In view of the potential disruption and the many already long-standing problems associated with the current location, the purpose of the programme is to consider whether it would be better to find a new long-term home for the Archives.
The archive collections contain millions of precious and fragile documents of great historical importance. It would be irresponsible to keep them on site given the dirt, dust, and huge disruption caused by the replacement of mechanical and electrical services as part of the Restoration & Renewal Programme. Also, it would not be possible to offer a service to the public or conduct normal operations from inside the Palace during this time.
The Victoria Tower, designed by Charles Barry as Parliament’s archive repository (record store), was completed in 1860, and refurbished in the 1950s. Continuing to run a modern archive service from inside this Grade-I listed Victorian building is causing a range of serious collection management problems and imposes severe limitations on the Archives’ ability to engage with the public. The key issues are:
The Victoria Tower is a major feature of the Palace of Westminster, a Grade-1 listed building. Building additional lifts of the capacity required would be very intrusive and, given the significant structural changes necessary to accommodate them, highly unlikely to be approved by statutory planners.
This will depend on the facilities and location chosen, and will emerge as a result of the research currently taking place. Archive buildings have very specialist requirements and need to be individually tailored to the collections and the organisation’s needs so it is difficult to determine before detailed analysis has been carried out.
A study researched our requirements in detail and visited a wide range of modern archive buildings to see best practice in other archive services. Then it undertook a rigorous process of option identification using the HM Treasury Green Book methodology, reducing a long-list of 36 options to seven, which include remaining in Victoria Tower, relocating somewhere else in London or moving altogether to an area outside of London.
There is no preferred option at present and we are undertaking audience research to help inform the decision on whether to remain in London or transfer to a regional location. Wherever the Archives is located, it will need to have good transport links so that we can open up the collections to as many members of the public as possible.
Current access is by appointment only. Approximately 1000 people visit to research onsite each year, and around another 1000 visitors come on tours behind the scenes. There are an additional 200,000 engagements through the Archives’ online services, social media and outreach activities across the country. When surveyed, 72% of people who visit one of the offsite exhibitions, and 84% of people who come to one of our events outside London, say that it makes them want to know more about Parliament today as a result.
The Archives has far more researchers accessing the collection than most other legislatures because our records date from much earlier than other countries’.
Onsite visitors to the Archives are largely academics or students and business people such as lawyers; only around 11% visiting for personal or leisure use such as family or local history (compared with 57% nationally). According to a 2012 survey, 64% of visitors are male and 96% are white. We get fewer disabled visitors than other archives (6% compared with 14% nationally) due to access issues.
We want to increase the diversity of users across age ranges, gender, and ethnicity; attract more family and local history users of the Archives; and encourage people to stay longer to explore the records in more depth in ways beyond traditional research, for example through exhibitions, workshops and other events.
We have undertaken a wide range of research activities over the years and have found that the most effective work we do in reaching new audiences takes place outside the Houses of Parliament, where we are not constrained by the accommodation. We are undertaking audience research to explore what further interest a new, accessible onsite service would generate. A 2012 report by the Archives and Records Association of the UK and Ireland into archive capital investment projects, revealed that archive services that have moved to a new location with better facilities for the public routinely double or triple their visitor numbers.
There are currently four million records of the House of Commons and House of Lords, dating from 1497 to the present. These include:
Together, these collections contain some of the most important constitutional documents in the UK and world, as well as the stories of individuals and communities from the fifteenth century onwards.
The collections contain some of the most important constitutional documents in the world, including the Death Warrant of Charles I (1649), the Bill of Rights (1689), the Great Reform Act (1832) and the Abdication Instrument of Edward VIII (1936). In addition, the Archives contains many foundation constitutional documents of other countries which were former British colonies (for example, the USA, Canada and Australia). Early acts of Parliament include the signatures of Tudor monarchs including Henry VIII.
Users of the Archives request a huge range of items such as records of proceedings in the Commons and the Lords from the seventeenth century onwards including records about the English Civil War and the abolition of slavery; acts of Parliament; records relating to specific politicians, especially for the early twentieth century; and plans of railways, docks, and harbours which are used by local historians.
The collection spans 8.26km in length as currently stored. An estimated 11km of shelving is required in total but, because we are intending to use an offsite storage contract for our lower-use records that will enable us to be more flexible about where we store items. In addition, over the next few years we expect the quantity of paper records to drastically decline in favour of digital records.
The National Archives manages the records of government departments, and the information policy around them. The records of Parliament are created by the House of Commons and the House of Lords, not by Government. To move them to the National Archives at Kew would require a constitutional change, for which an Act of Parliament would be required, and would break an important and much valued link between Parliament today and its heritage.
There is already an established digitisation programme in place but it would take hundreds of years to digitise all of our collections. Although we currently prioritise collections which we feel would benefit from digitisation either for access or conservation reasons, it would be a waste of public money to digitise records that are perhaps only consulted once in a generation. Once digitised, the originals still need to be stored. In addition, the public – who effectively ‘own’ the collection – have a right to enjoy the experience of accessing original documents, such as a parchment act signed by Henry VIII, in person.
The shortlisted options were reviewed in summer 2015 and a business case with one recommended option, costed and designed, will be put forward to both Houses in autumn 2016, after a decision is taken on the restoration and renewal of the Palace of Westminster. Further updates will be available in due course.