Press notice No. 53 of Session 2008-09
10 August 2009
YOUTH SENTENCES MUST BE LEARNING TOOL TO WORK TO PREVENT MORE CRIME, SAYS COMMITTEE
Evidence shows deterrent sentencing rarely effective in youth offending
The Commons Justice Select Committee today publishes its response to the Sentencing Guidelines Council on the new guidance the Council has issued on overarching principles in sentencing youth under 18.
The Committee usually provides comments on draft guidelines to the Sentencing Guidelines Council in the form of a letter; where it considers that a draft guideline raises major issues it reports to the House. The Committee considers that the "Overarching principlessentencing youths" is a crucial sentencing guideline, saying it "fills a critical gap, setting out for youth courts the basis upon which they should sentence offenders under the age of 18"guidance which the youth courts have not previously had.
The Committee's response highlights the key issues raised in evidence to it, for example, the apparent inconsistency in approaches to sentencing children, and a varied understanding among sentencers of the concept that custody should only ever be a "sentence of last resort" for young people.
Rt Hon Sir Alan Beith, Chairman of the Committee, said: "Having an overarching set of principles should improve the consistency and effectiveness of youth sentencing, but the guidance needs to be clear and sound, and the aims of the guidance need to be clear. And the guidance will not work if suitable community based sentences are not available in the court's area. We were particularly concerned at the lack of programmes for girls, and the lack of suitable accommodation in some areas for boys carrying out community sentences.
"We know that custody does not work to reduce reoffending, and that it does not have a deterrent effect on young people, because their crimes are usually opportunistic and impulsive, so it is vital that effective alternatives are available. The automatic use of custody to deal with young people who fail to comply with the terms of their sentence or Rehabilitation Order can be the wrong approachthese are mainly young people with chaotic lifestyles and no parental support, and active intervention to make sure they turn up can be a much better investment of taxpayers' money than automatic and expensive custody."
The Committee also stressed that courts should have access to information about a young offender's mental health, learning difficulties and communication problems to enable the most appropriate sentence to be imposed.
The Committee says the evidence it took on this draft sentencing guideline highlighted key areas in relation to youth justice deserving of further scrutiny, such as the use of remand and provisions for offenders aged 18-24, and it will consider how to pursue these areas further in its work. / ENDS
1. Committee membership is as follows: Rt Hon Sir Alan Beith MP (Chairman), Mr David Heath MP, Rt Hon Douglas Hogg MP, Siân James MP, Jessica Morden MP, Julie Morgan MP, Rt Hon Alun Michael MP, Robert Neill MP, Dr Nick Palmer MP, Linda Riordan MP, Virendra Sharma MP, Mr Andrew Turner MP, Mr Andrew Tyrie MP and Dr Alan Whitehead MP
2. The report is published as the Committee's Tenth Report of Session 2008-09 (HC 497)
Media Enquiries: Jessica Bridges Palmer (020 7219 0724) email: [email protected]; Clare Mills (07795 662742);
Specific Committee Information: Tel 020 7219 8196/ 8198, email: [email protected]
Committee Website: www.parliament.uk/justicecom
Watch committees and parliamentary debates online: www.parliamentlive.tv
Select Committee Calendar: www.parliament.uk/what_s_on/hoc_news3.cfm
Publications / Reports / Reference Material: Copies of all select committee reports are available from the Parliamentary Bookshop (12 Bridge St, Westminster, 020 7219 3890) or the Stationery Office (0845 7023474). Committee reports, press releases, evidence transcripts, Bills; research papers, a directory of MPs, plus Hansard (from 8am daily) and much more, can be found on www.parliament.uk