LORDS

The Dowling Review

07 July 2015

On Tuesday 7 July the House of Lords Science and Technology Committee will question Professor Dame Ann Dowling, President of the Royal Academy of Engineering, on her review into how businesses can best connect with university research.

Background

The Dowling Review, published on Thursday 2 July, urges the Government to simplify the ways in which universities and industry collaborate. It also calls for a culture change in universities and businesses in order to support collaboration.

Witnesses

The evidence session will take place in Committee Room 4A, Palace of Westminster.

At 10.40am

  • Professor Dame Ann Dowling DBE, FRS, FREng, President of the Royal Academy of Engineering
  • Dr Hayaatun Sillem, Director of Programmes and Fellowship, the Royal Academy of Engineering

Possible questions

  • Why has the research and business landscape become so complex?
  • What are the best ways to simplify it?
  • What is the culture change that is needed in universities and businesses?
  • Is the idea that business-funded research can lead to a perceived conflict of interest a valid one?
  • What can be done about that?
  • What makes this review more important than many of the others before it?

Further information

Image: iStockphoto

Publications

  • Close

    Glossary

    • Reports and associated evidence - reports and evidence featuring written submissions and corrected oral evidence published at the conclusion of Committee inquiries. Evidence is periodically updated over the course of an inquiry and is not finalised until the relevant Report is published.
    • Uncorrected oral evidence - transcripts of oral evidence not yet approved by the Committee or witnesses.
    • Other oral evidence - corrected transcripts of oral evidence, usually taken for scrutiny purposes or for ad hoc/regular evidence sessions with Ministers.
    • Evidence - written submissions and corrected oral evidence published for scrutiny purposes or for ad hoc/regular evidence sessions with Ministers.
    • Responses to Reports - Government Department and European Commission responses to reports.
    • Call for Evidence - request to submit evidence to a Committee inquiry.
    • Correspondence - correspondence received and sent by the Committee excluding ministerial correspondence.
    • Correspondence with Ministers - Ministerial correspondence received and sent by the Committee.
    • Progress of Scrutiny - records the decisions taken by the EU Committee on European documents that have been deposited in Parliament for scrutiny.