Cumulative impact of statutory instruments on schools

The Committee observed that in the 2006-07 session the Department for Children, Schools and Families (DCSF) schools made over  100 different regulations that affected schools, the majority of them in July to take effect in September. Witnesses included teachers, head teachers and school governors who explained the practical problems that this caused. Based on what they told us, the report  recommends that there should be less legislation and proposes ways in which it can be managed better.

Evidence given to the Inquiry indicated poor coordination of legislation within the DCSF, and virtually no evaluation being done before amending legislation was brought forward. Witnesses complained that systems were being amended before they had been fully implemented. The Merits Committee's report argues for less Government reliance on regulations, in order to leave greater room for the professionalism of teachers to deliver the objectives of improving education.

The Government response agreed to use common commencement dates and we received further comments on that response from some of the witnesses. The House debated the Merits Committee's report on 19 June. We are pleased to note that DCSF has continued to progress this agenda, a follow up letter from the Labour government is  included in our end of session report for 2008-09 and a letter from the current government's Education Minister is included in our 10th report of session 2010-12


  • Close


    • Reports and associated evidence - reports and evidence featuring written submissions and corrected oral evidence published at the conclusion of Committee inquiries. Evidence is periodically updated over the course of an inquiry and is not finalised until the relevant Report is published.
    • Uncorrected oral evidence - transcripts of oral evidence not yet approved by the Committee or witnesses.
    • Other oral evidence - corrected transcripts of oral evidence, usually taken for scrutiny purposes or for ad hoc/regular evidence sessions with Ministers.
    • Evidence - written submissions and corrected oral evidence published for scrutiny purposes or for ad hoc/regular evidence sessions with Ministers.
    • Responses to Reports - Government Department and European Commission responses to reports.
    • Call for Evidence - request to submit evidence to a Committee inquiry.
    • Correspondence - correspondence received and sent by the Committee excluding ministerial correspondence.
    • Correspondence with Ministers - Ministerial correspondence received and sent by the Committee.
    • Progress of Scrutiny - records the decisions taken by the EU Committee on European documents that have been deposited in Parliament for scrutiny.
No results found.