LORDS

Academics questioned on constitutional implications of Scottish independence

05 March 2014

The House of Lords Constitution Committee will this week take evidence from leading academics on the constitutional implications for the rest of the UK of a ‘yes’ vote in the September referendum on Scottish independence.

Witnesses

At 10.30am, Wednesday 5 March 2014, Committee room 1, Palace of Westminster:

  • Professor Alan Boyle, Professor of Public International Law at the University of Edinburgh. Co-author of the legal advice to the UK Government on the status of an independent Scotland
  • Professor Michael Keating, Professor of Politics and Chair in Scottish Politics at the University of Aberdeen
  • Professor Stephen Tierney, Professor of Constitutional Theory at the University of Edinburgh

Likely questions

Areas the Committee is likely to cover with the witnesses include:

  • What legal principles should govern negotiations for Scottish independence in the event of a ‘yes’ vote?
  • Is the timetable of independence by March 2016 realistic and what impact would the timing of the 2015 general election have on independence negotiations?
  • What role if any should Scottish MPs have in holding the negotiators to account?
  • Should the negotiating teams be held directly accountable to the public?
  • What legislation would be required at Westminster to achieve independence for Scotland?
  • What impact would independence have on the monarchy and would Scotland need a governor-general?
  • What legal principles should apply to negotiations on the divisions of assets and debts that are currently UK-wide.

Further information

Image: iStock photo 

More news on: Parliament, government and politics, Parliament, House of Lords news, Lords news, Scotland, Committee news, Constitution, Devolution

Share this page